Skip to content Skip to menu

Cookie settings

Here you can set the use of cookies according to your preferences.

Technical cookies

are necessary for the proper functioning of the site. Technical cookies must always be active (they cannot be deactivated individually), therefore no consent is given for their use.

Analytical cookies

they allow us to understand how you use the site so that we can improve it. Analytical cookies allow us to measure website performance (number of visits and traffic sources). We process the data obtained in this way in summary, without the use of identifiers pointing to a specific user.

Personalized cookies

store information about your personal site settings. We need personalized cookies in order to adapt the website and its behavior as much as possible to your needs and interests.

Advertising cookies

set up through this site by our advertising partners. Advertising cookies allow us to display such content that will be interesting and useful just for you.

We use cookies

We use cookies to analyze traffic, remember preferences and improve the usability of the website. To give your consent, click on the "I Agree" button.

Settings I agree

You can refuse consent at any time.

Research Centre

Article: Predatory publishing in Scopus

25. 2. 2021

Interesting article about predatory publishing in Scopus.

Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences

Vít Macháček & Martin Srholec

Abstract 

Predatory publishing represents a major challenge to scholarly communication. This paper maps the infiltration of journals suspected of predatory practices into the citation database Scopus and examines cross-country differences in the propensity of scholars to publish in such journals. Using the names of “potential, possible, or probable” predatory journals and publishers on Beall’s lists, we derived the ISSNs of 3,293 journals from Ulrichsweb and searched Scopus with them. 324 of journals that appear both in Beall’s lists and Scopus with 164 thousand articles published over 2015–2017 were identified. Analysis of data for 172 countries in 4 fields of research indicates that there is a remarkable heterogeneity. In the most affected countries, including Kazakhstan and Indonesia, around 17% of articles fall into the predatory category, while some other countries have no predatory articles whatsoever. Countries with large research sectors at the medium level of economic development, especially in Asia and North Africa, tend to be most susceptible to predatory publishing. Arab, oil-rich and/or eastern countries also appear to be particularly vulnerable. Policymakers and stakeholders in these and other developing countries need to pay more attention to the quality of research evaluation.

 

 Full text: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences